QTJ1
QTJ1: The Ultimate Mutant Processor for LGA1151
QTJ1: The Ultimate Mutant Processor for LGA1151
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Comparison between Xeon E5 2678v3 and QQLS Processors
3. Pros and Cons of Xeon Processors for Work
4. Gaming Performance of Xeon Processors
5. Introduction to Mutant QTJ1
6. Specifications of QTJ1 compared to Core i9 10980HK
7. Performance Comparison between QQLS and QTJ1
8. Overclocking Potential of QQLS and QTJ1
9. Benchmark Results of QQLS and QTJ1
· AIDA64 Test
· CPU Queen Test
· Cinebench R15 and R20 Tests
· Geekbench 5 Test
· Novabench Test
· WinRAR and 7-Zip Tests
· RealBench 2.43 Test
· V-Ray Benchmark
· Adobe Lightroom 2020 Test
· Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 Test
· PCMark 10 Test
· 3DMark Fire Strike and Time Spy Tests
· Gaming Performance Tests (Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Battlefield V, Far Cry 5, Forza Horizon 4, Mafia Definitive Edition, Red Dead Redemption 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, Total War Saga Troy, Watch Dogs 2, World of Tanks enCore RT)
10. Conclusion
11. Resources
🚀 Introduction
Welcome to TechnoPlanet! In this video, we will be discussing the comparison between two processors, Xeon E5 2678v3 and QQLS. We will analyze their performance in different scenarios and determine their suitability for both work and gaming purposes. Additionally, we will introduce a new mutant processor, QTJ1, and compare its specifications to the Core i9 10980HK. Finally, we will evaluate the performance, overclocking potential, and benchmark results of both QQLS and QTJ1 to help you make an informed decision for your PC upgrade or build.
Comparison between Xeon E5 2678v3 and QQLS Processors
Before diving into the details of QTJ1, let's first compare the Xeon E5 2678v3 and QQLS processors. We will explore their features, performance, and price to understand which one offers better value for different use cases.
Pros and Cons of Xeon Processors for Work
Xeon processors have numerous advantages when it comes to work environments. They are affordable, provide excellent performance, and can handle demanding tasks with ease. However, they may lag behind in terms of gaming performance due to their lower clock speeds compared to mutant processors. Overall, Xeon processors are a cost-effective option for work-related tasks, offering similar performance to their desktop counterparts.
Gaming Performance of Xeon Processors
In terms of gaming performance, Xeon processors tend to fall behind mutant processors due to their lower clock speeds. In poorly optimized games and older titles, Xeon processors may even exhibit up to a 50% performance gap compared to mutant processors. Therefore, if gaming is a priority for you, it might be better to consider a mutant processor for optimal gaming experience.
Introduction to Mutant QTJ1
Now, let's shift our focus to the star of the show - QTJ1. QTJ1 is a relatively new mutant processor built on the LGA1151 socket. It is positioned as an alternative to the Core i9 10980HK, offering comparable performance at a lower price point. While information about QTJ1 is scarce, we will dig deeper to uncover its true potential and determine if it lives up to the hype.
Specifications of QTJ1 compared to Core i9 10980HK
Based on available information, QTJ1 is considered an analog of the Core i9 10980HK. Both processors share similar technical specifications, including integrated graphics and support for PCI Express 4.0. However, it is important to note that motherboards on LGA1151 support only PCI Express 3.0, limiting the full capabilities of QTJ1. We will investigate if this limitation affects the performance of QTJ1 in real-world scenarios.
Performance Comparison between QQLS and QTJ1
To determine the performance differences between QQLS and QTJ1, we conducted a series of tests on identical systems with both processors. Both systems were overclocked to the same frequencies, and their performance in various benchmarks and real-world tasks was evaluated. Let's dive into the results and see how QQLS and QTJ1 stack up against each other.
Overclocking Potential of QQLS and QTJ1
When it comes to overclocking, QTJ1 proved to be more promising. To achieve a stable frequency of 4.7GHz, QTJ1 required 130mV less voltage compared to QQLS. This substantial voltage difference indicates that QTJ1 has a higher overclocking potential. With similar voltage settings, QTJ1 can potentially achieve higher frequencies, offering a performance advantage over QQLS.
Benchmark Results of QQLS and QTJ1
In our comprehensive benchmark testing, we assessed the performance of QQLS and QTJ1 across various CPU-intensive tasks and gaming scenarios. We used industry-standard benchmarking tools to ensure accurate and reliable results. Let's delve into the benchmark results to determine the performance differences between the two processors in different use cases.
AIDA64 Test
The AIDA64 test analyzed the speed of CPU and cache memory. Both QQLS and QTJ1 demonstrated similar performance, with negligible differences in speeds. The results indicated that both processors offer comparable efficiency in handling memory-intensive tasks.
CPU Queen Test
The CPU Queen test evaluated the single-threaded performance of QQLS and QTJ1. Both processors achieved identical results, showcasing their matching capabilities in handling single-threaded workloads.
Cinebench R15 and R20 Tests
The Cinebench R15 and R20 tests measured the performance of QQLS and QTJ1 in multi-threaded tasks. The results were consistent across both versions of Cinebench, with both processors offering identical performance. This highlights their ability to efficiently handle multi-threaded workloads without any significant differences.
Geekbench 5 Test
In the Geekbench 5 test, the QQLS and QTJ1 processors exhibited almost identical performance in single-core operations. However, QTJ1 had a slight advantage in multi-core operations, outperforming QQLS by 2.5%. This marginal difference indicates that QTJ1 can handle multi-threaded tasks slightly more efficiently.
Novabench Test
The Novabench test evaluated the overall performance of QQLS and QTJ1 in various computing tasks, including CPU, GPU, and RAM performance. The results displayed similar scores for both processors, indicating comparable overall performance.
WinRAR and 7-Zip Tests
In the WinRAR and 7-Zip tests, both QQLS and QTJ1 processors achieved identical performance in compressing and decompressing files. These results further reinforce the Notion that both processors offer similar efficiency in CPU-intensive tasks.
RealBench 2.43 Test
The RealBench 2.43 test assessed the performance of QQLS and QTJ1 in real-world scenarios, including image editing, video encoding, and multitasking. The results yielded slightly higher scores for QQLS, suggesting that it performs marginally better in real-world scenarios. However, the difference is insignificant and could be attributed to measurement error.
V-Ray Benchmark
V-Ray benchmarking assessed the rendering performance of QQLS and QTJ1 in 3D modeling environments. Results indicated virtually identical performance, further highlighting the similarity in capabilities of both processors when it comes to rendering complex 3D scenes.
Adobe Lightroom 2020 Test
The Adobe Lightroom 2020 test measured the processing speed of QQLS and QTJ1 in editing and converting a large number of RAW files to JPG format with multiple adjustments. Both processors completed the task simultaneously, indicating similar performance and efficiency.
Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 Test
The Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 test evaluated the performance of QQLS and QTJ1 in video editing and rendering. QTJ1 exhibited a slight advantage, outperforming QQLS by 1.3% in video processing. This indicates that QTJ1 can handle video editing tasks slightly more efficiently.
PCMark 10 Test
In the PCMark 10 test, which evaluates overall system performance in everyday tasks, both QQLS and QTJ1 achieved comparable scores. This suggests that both processors provide similar performance and efficiency in typical day-to-day computer usage.
3DMark Fire Strike and Time Spy Tests
The 3DMark Fire Strike and Time Spy tests examined the graphical performance of QQLS and QTJ1 in gaming environments. QTJ1 showcased a slight advantage, outperforming QQLS by 5% in Fire Strike and 3% in Time Spy. These results Affirm that QTJ1 offers a minor boost in gaming performance.
Gaming Performance Tests
We conducted several gaming performance tests across various titles, including Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Battlefield V, Far Cry 5, Forza Horizon 4, Mafia Definitive Edition, Red Dead Redemption 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, Total War Saga Troy, Watch Dogs 2, and World of Tanks enCore RT. In most games, the performance difference between QQLS and QTJ1 was negligible, with both processors delivering similar frame rates. However, in certain titles such as Far Cry 5 and Forza Horizon 4, QTJ1 exhibited a slight advantage, outperforming QQLS by a few percentage points.
Conclusion
After extensive testing, it is clear that both QQLS and QTJ1 processors offer comparable performance in various work and gaming scenarios. While there are minor performance differences, the disparity is not significant enough to justify the higher price tag of QTJ1. However, considering the overclocking potential, energy efficiency, and lower heat output, QTJ1 might be a preferred choice for overclocking enthusiasts and those seeking better power management. Ultimately, the decision between QQLS and QTJ1 should be based on individual needs, budget, and priorities.
Highlights
· Xeon E5 2678v3 and QQLS processors compared in terms of work and gaming performance
· Introduction to the mutant processor, QTJ1, and its potential as a Core i9 10980HK alternative
· Performance, overclocking potential, and benchmark results of QQLS and QTJ1 evaluated across various tests and scenarios
· Both processors offer similar performance, with marginal differences in specific tasks and gaming performance
· Factors such as price, overclocking potential, energy efficiency, and heat output should be considered when making a choice between QQLS and QTJ1.
FAQ
Q: What is the difference between Xeon processors and mutant processors?\ A: Xeon processors are cost-effective options for work-related tasks, offering similar performance to their desktop counterparts. Mutant processors, on the other hand, are known for their gaming performance and higher clock speeds.
Q: Is QTJ1 better than QQLS for gaming?\ A: While both processors offer similar gaming performance, QTJ1 has a slight advantage in certain titles due to its higher clock speeds. However, the difference is not significant enough to warrant a clear preference for one over the other.
